Editing
U.S. Government's "Delicate Balance" During Arab Spring
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
"The administration has tried to balance its ties to Mr. Mubarak with expressions of concern about rigged elections and jailed dissidents in his country."(New York Times, 1/26/2011) [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/world/26diplo.html] "The upheaval in Egypt has put the United States in a delicate diplomatic situation: pressing for a more democratic Egypt, but wary that too much change could threaten the stability that Egypt helps bring to the Middle East." (USA Today, 2/1/2011) [http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/02/01-10] "The chaos in Egypt posed a delicate diplomatic challenge for the United States: appealing for democracy without alienating an ally."(Margaret Warner, PBS NewsHour, 1/31/2011) [http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/02/01-10] "Is it a bit of a tightrope that the U.S. has to walk here, though, in terms of wanting to promote democracy on the one hand, but being a longtime ally of the Mubarak administration?" (Kate Snow, NBC Nightly News, 1/29/2011) [http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/02/01-10] "As an ally and benefactor, the United States has helped prop up the 82-year-old strongman since he took power 30 years ago, and today it is in a unique position to impress upon him the importance of democracy." (L.A. Times, 1/28/2011) [http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jan/28/opinion/la-ed-egypt-20110128] "The implications are really big because this is very fundamental. Egypt receives the most American aid, more than $1 billion a year. It has the same goals as the United States against radicalization and terrorism, pro the Israeli peace process. But the United States, many people are saying, needs to get ahead of the curve, because otherwise it might be left behind as the people demonstrate their will." (Christiane Amanpour, 1/26/2011) [http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/02/01-10] "The Washington Post published a January 27 piece headlined 'As Arabs Protest, U.S. Speaks Up,' which declared that the White House was "openly supporting the anti-government demonstrations shaking the Arab Middle East," adding that the administration had 'thrown U.S. support clearly behind the protesters, speaking daily in favor of free speech and assembly even when the protests target longtime U.S. allies such as Egypt.' "The Post's evidence, however, was thin: a quote from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stating that the Mubarak government should "respond to the legitimate needs and interests of the Egyptian people." The strongest support for the notion that the U.S. was backing the street protests came from an anonymous administration official--hardly an indication of 'speak[ing] up' in 'open support.'" [http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/02/01-10]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Accupedia are considered to be released under the Attribution 3.0 Unported (see
Accupedia:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information